Monday,
March 4, 2002
Uganda EC Scandal: Equipment Idle
By WAIRAGALA WAKABI
THE EASTAFRICAN
THE CONTROVERSY surrounding
Uganda's electronic photographic voters' register has deepened further
with the discovery that the Electoral Commission has failed to put to any
use equipment worth billions of shillings that it bought from the firm
contracted to offer consultancy services.
After investigating the deal,
the Inspectorate of Government (IGG) has concluded that there was a conflict
of interest when the Rank Consult/ Omicron consortium supplied the equipment.
The firm had been contracted to integrate various software and hardware
supplied by other companies.
The IGG indicates that, despite
"vehement opposition" from the EC's data processing staff, the Commission
went ahead and allowed the consultants to supply the equipment, which is
lying idle in the commission's stores.
For example, voters' photographs
were originally supposed to be backed up on ordinary 3.5-inch 1.44-megabyte
floppy disks, but last July Rank Consult/ Omicron recommended that the
commission procure 5,000 Super Discs for back up.
In another instance, when
Commission staff identified faults in the system last September, including
slow rate of data capture and mistakes in voters' particulars and locations,
they recommended that manual data entry be used to supplement the 60 licences
for ICR (Eyes and Hands) software.
This would have involved
recruitment of additional staff, since computers were already in place.
Instead, 90 additional licences for ICR software were procured from Omicron
at a cost of over Ush800 million ($459,770).
Originally, 5,000 photo screens
had been supplied at a cost of $15,675. But it was later discovered that
they could not be used so they, too, are lying in the stores. Screens of
a different colour were then purchased.
Mr Frank Katusiime, the head
of the Rank Consult/ Omicron joint venture, on December 1, 2001 wrote to
the secretary to the commission, requesting that Omicron be allowed to
supply 20 additional licences for data analysis for $400,000 in order to
speed up the project.
The spokesman of the IGG,
Mr Martin Okumu, said their investigations had revealed several cases of
abuse of office, financial mismanagement and conflict of interest in the
award of tenders. He declined to provide details.
But an investigator said:
"The consultants gave the commission supplies, equipment and software,
which amounted to a conflict of interest, since their contract was solely
for system integration."
Mr Katusiime could not be
reached for comment as he was last week reported to be out of the country.
Commission officials said they could not comment on ongoing investigations.
Concerns have also been raised
about the effectiveness of the $145,297 laminator and the $232,611 die-cutter
(both supplied by Omicron). The colour printers are also said to be "slow."
Officials in the IGG's office
said that the conflict of interest and irregularities in tendering at the
Commission were a principal reason for the increase in the cost of the
project from the initial $6 million to over $17 million.
The register is yet to be
completed, 16 months after the consultants were engaged. Delays in the
project were partly to blame for the muddled local government elections
early this year.
During trials of the PVRIS
system between April and September last year, data processing staff of
the EC discovered that there was a high prevalence of misinterpretation
of characters, a problem that was compounded by lack of comprehensive documents
detailing all aspects of the system.
The consultants were ill-prepared
or lacked adequate knowledge of the system.
The government's procurement
adviser, Swipco, on December 4, 2000, ruled that none of the bidding firms
for consultancy on PVRIS was qualified. It recommended that the best option
would be to cancel the tender and begin a new procurement process: "None
of the proposals were responsive to the requirements. In addition, the
detailed technical evaluation indicates that none of the bidders is eligible
for financial evaluation."
Since equipment for PVRIS
was procured from various firms, there was need for an integrator to ensure
various components of the project could work as one system. Rank Consult/
Omicron and Pan American Business Solutions Inc were the two bidders.
Commission staff have told
the IGG that the consultants worked in total secrecy, denying them access
to the PVRIS integration system. They said any view contrary to the consultants'
was considered "sabotage."
Sources said that while the
Rank Consult/Omicron agreement indicated that 12 consultants were to work
on the project, available information shows that only four consultants
have been working consistently, the others having left last March.
It was learnt that technical
staff in the Data Processing department of the EC did not take part in
identifying the specifications and quantities of the required equipment
and software for PVRIS.
Documents made available
to The EastAfrican indicate that the system recommended by the bureaucrats
was deficient.
"It was not tested before
the Commission decided on using it, yet nowhere in the world had it been
used before," a source said. Various components like scanners, software,
facial recognition software and a die-cutter were to be supplied by various
firms.
A separate team that travelled
to South Africa, which included two commissioners and the head of the EC's
data processing department, identified a complete system at MGX Holdings
Ltd, which would have been able to produce the register in 45 days at a
cost of $7 million.
A report by the SA team says
MGX demonstrated to them how their system worked. It added that the system
had been used in Turkey to process 18 million census records in 30 working
days. Uganda's register has just over eight million voters.
Last December, the consultants
told the Minister for Justice and Constitutional Affairs, Ms Janat Mukwaya,
that commission staff were sabotaging the project. As a result, the three
top officials of the data processing department were sent on suspension.