Monday,
March 4, 2002
Tanzania's NSSF
Now Pursuing Defaulters
By FAUSTINE RWAMBALI
THE EASTAFRICAN
TANZANIA'S National Social
Security Fund (NSSF) will this week embark on a countrywide crackdown on
employers who do not remit employees' contributions to the pension fund,
a contravention of the NSSF Act, 1997.
The NSSF public relations
manager, Mr Frank Maduga, told The EastAfrican last week that the
crackdown was expected to start on Monday this week when NSSF inspectors
would scrutinise records of all employers, including diplomatic missions.
"The crackdown targets all
unregistered employers and employees; those who do not contribute fully
and those who deduct salaries from their employees but fail to remit the
money to NSSF," he said.
Mr Maduga said that the thrust
of the exercise would be in Dar es Salaam, where most major employers are
based.
"This time we have decided
to change our inspectors, because some of them have been colluding with
certain employers," Mr Maduga said.
The number of private employers
in Tanzania has grown greatly in the past decade because of privatisation
of the nearly 400 parastatals that were the country's main employers.
According to the NSSF Act,
any person who contravenes the Act is liable to a fine not exceeding Tsh100,000
($104) or imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years or both.
However, some observers have
said that the fines are too lenient on defaulters. They suggest that the
fines or term of imprisonment be raised in order to arrest the situation.
The EastAfrican
has discovered that most defaulting employers in Dar es Salaam falsify
records of salaries and allowances paid as well as of the number of employees,
which translates into smaller contributions to the pension fund. While
some workers take home upward of Tsh300,000 ($310), their pension deductable
amount could be half of that.
According to sources, most
of the defaulting employers have in recent days been engaging workers from
India, Pakistan, Mauritius and Somalia, whom they do not pay. These workers
are made to live in warehouses with their only pay being food and accommodation.
"They do not have any work permits and residence documentation," said one
source.
Other employers do not remit
employees' contributions on the pretext that the employees are hired on
a "temporary basis" while the NSSF Act stipulates that even temporary employees
fall under the NSSF Act, said Mr Maduga.
"We have discovered that
some companies had only 20 per cent of staff on the permanent payroll.
In other words, such an employer might be cheating or doing something sinister
in order to exploit his staff," he said.
On diplomatic missions, the
NSSF source said that it had been discovered that most embassies did not
contribute to the fund.
"But we find it difficult
to take them to court as most of the time the government intervenes under
the pretext that they enjoy diplomatic immunity," said the source, adding
that such a practice was against the laws of the host country.
Recently, it was reported
that four diplomatic missions, Libya, Iran, Syria and Sudan were not remitting
workers' contributions to the NSSF as the law requires. Some had been in
the country for more than 40 years but had never contributed to the Fund.
However, it was not clear how NSSF would tackle the diplomatic immunity
issue.
According to the NSSF Act,
an employee "is any person who is employed in Mainland Tanzania under any
contract of service or apprenticeship with an employer, whether by way
of manual labour, clerical work or otherwise and however paid."
It also defines an employee
as "a person who is permanently resident in Mainland Tanzania and is employed
outside Mainland Tanzania under a contract of service with an employer
in Mainland Tanzania by whom he is paid."
The NSSF, which replaced
the National Provident Fund (NPF), is a compulsory scheme that covers all
employees in the private sector and NGOs.