Monday, March 12, 2001
What's Kivuitu Hiding Up His Sleeve for 2002?
I READ the article titled "No Clear Winner in 2002 Kenya Election" (The
East African edition of Feb 26- March 4) with great interest and trepidation.
No doubt, the chairman of the Electoral Commission of Kenya Mr Samuel
Kivuitu, rubs shoulders with a very large diversity of political opinion
on a daily basis.
This makes him more privileged than most people, when it comes to knowing
in which direction the political wind is blowing and possibly at what speed
that wind could be blowing.
Definitely, he has made a point on this issue, which many people across
this nation must be discussing and analysing in great detail.
It is also indisputable that the majority of prospective presidential
candidates across the party divide seem to be hesitant to come out clearly
on their candidature in the 2002 election.
Those who intend to cross party lines hesitate to state clearly on which
political party's platform they will contest the seats, or, in the case
of Kanu, whether the incumbent will contest again or who, if President
Moi is not in the running, will be the parties' flagbearer.
I am not saying the foregoing due to ignorance of the current constitutional
provision of "two terms of five years each." There is a dearth of interpretations
of this clause.
However, the point I wish to make is that voters always need time to
decide whom they will elect. The time for that crucial declaration by candidates
therefore is now.
I dare say that if anyone believes that President Moi will be forced
to step down under the two-terms clause when a comprehensive review of
the Kenyan Constitution is in the offing, they only do that at their own
peril.
Mr Kivuitu predicted that the 2002 election was "likely to engender
the kind of violence witnessed during the campaigns and voting in the South
Mugirango by-election two months ago.
"Why, one may ask, did the Electoral Commission not invoke the Code
of Conduct during the South Mugirango by-election to guarantee the voters'
peace? Why did the Commission not protect or defend its own agents ?
The last word we heard about the problems of the by-election was that
if any agent of the Commission felt aggrieved, they could sue their attackers
in the civil courts.
The electoral laws are very clear on the issue of electoral violence.
The fact that the current Commission has not seen it fit to apply the law
to the letter does not give its chairman the authority or right to begin
planting the evil seeds of electoral violence in the minds of Kenyans ahead
of the elections. We all want the next elections to be free, fair and peaceful.
It would be very healthy indeed were Mr Kivuitu to come back and explain
to the public what powers the law provides and how his Commission intends
to apply in the 2002 elections to ensure the safety of Kenyan electors
and therefore, a free and fair election.
If indeed, real difficulties can be foreseen now, how does the Commission
chairman plan to handle them?
PEREZ OLINDO
Nairobi