| |
Editorial
Monday, May
10, 2004
Go For Local Investment
Another meeting with the moneymen
was held in Nairobi last week at the initiative of the International Finance
Corporation (IFC), the World Bank's private sector lending arm, and The
Financial Times of London, with the familiar theme of attracting investment
funds to Africa.
With the exception of two
visionary contributions - that economic reform policies need to focus on
local investors and that true entrepreneurs now need to stand up and be
counted - the rest may have been all gleaned from a well-stocked public
library. In short, it was the usual mourning of Africa's marginalisation,
official inertia to reform and investors turning their backs on the high
returns offered by opportunities in Africa.
The conference, whose theme
was "Developing Business and Infrastructure in Africa," was reflective
of similar high-profile parleys that, beyond the talk, add little value
to the continent. They could be on HIV/Aids, tourism, or any of he litany
of problems afflicting the region, with an accompanying wish-list of solutions
to them that may be a replication of a seminar held in a far-off capital
20 years ago.
In short, Africa's problems
are known, but the solutions may not be as generic as resolutions reached
after key meetings suggest. One or two illustrations are in order. The
International Telecommunications Union (ITU) benchmark for construction
of a telephone line is $1,500 but, in a country like Kenya, operators say
$600 would be adequate. For roads, the bitumen and paving standards advocated
by development partners are quite expensive compared with concrete standards,
which research shows are also more durable. The Kenya Tea Development Agency
manages to keep roads in tea zones passable in all weather using paltry
resources compared with the Ksh100 billion ($1.28b) that the government
is seeking from investors. Why does resource-constrained Africa have to
follow the expensive ways of the West, even when they do not suit local
conditions?
That is the question forcing
the Bretton Woods institutions to review their policies on development
in Africa. The proposal that privatisation policies should favour local
investors was made by none other than IFC chief economist Michael Klein.
That local public and private investors need to take the development challenge
head on had a homely feel coming from Marc Ravalomanana, Madagascar's president.
This perception could not
have been more inspired. In Kenya, the informal sector, which relies up
to 80 per cent on local resources, is the fastest growing, employing millions
of people even as the government denies them hospitable working conditions.
The Informal workshop will be invariably in the most unserviced section
of a town, where it competes for space with effluent from formal industries
and all manner of underworld dealers.
These are the investors who
need to be supported and urged on to create employment, with technical
assistance on value-adding to their products taking precedence over meetings
in five-star hotels. So far, only a few companies constrained to display
their corporate social responsibility offer support to the Jua Kali sector
as corruption and bureaucracy denies them prompt government support.
The fickle association with
foreign development partners - donors, lenders, investors - needs to steer
the region's policy makers towards homegrown solutions. A motivated local
industry promises more consistent and fast track gains than the reluctant
overseas merchant.
Comments\Views
about this article
|
 |