Regional
Monday, May
10, 2004
Only Local Resources Can Save Third World
Economies
By PETER MUNAITA
THE EASTAFRICAN
LOCAL RESOURCES remain the
best bet for capital injection into Africa's infrastructure and business
sectors, negating persistent efforts by governments to rope in foreign
investors who are increasingly put off by the continent's perceived political
risks.
An open conference on improving
physical and regulatory infrastructure in Africa was told in Nairobi last
week that privatisation policies should encourage small local investors,
a tangible break from the recent past when the Bretton Woods institutions
insisted on the inclusion of "strategic investors" during public divestiture.
Michael Klein, chief economist
at the International Finance Corporation (IFC) said that developing countries
risked crowding out domestic firms from big projects despite their vast
knowledge of the domestic market. Mr Klein's comments come in the wake
of a heated debate in Kenya over privatisation of public assets, with the
prevalent view being that Kenyans should be empowered to buy the institutions
through credit schemes. Attempts to sell strategic interests in state corporations
like Kenya Reinsurance Corporation and Telkom Kenya have strengthened the
case for local ownership, especially given the token offers by overseas
companies for fairly solid parastatals.
The government had to call
off the privatisation of both Kenya Re and Telkom Kenya after receiving
low offers, leaving Kenya Airways association with KLM, brokered through
the IFC, as the only showcase for divestiture through strategic partnership
in the country.
The other strategic partnership,
between Vodafone and Telkom Kenya, in the country's leading mobile phone
service provider, Safaricom, is a joint venture in which divestiture was
not involved. With attention shifting towards physical facilities, the
government is considering the concessioning of Kenya Railways and Kenya
Ports Authority through performance-based management contracts to utility
operators.
Experts say that African
countries fail to attract private capital for developing business and infrastructure
citing policy lags and reversal as a key hindrance. "Market, financial,
regulatory and institutional constraints are issues that African governments
need to address," said Nick Allen, Corporate Finance and Privatisation
Strategy head at PriceWaterhouseCoopers.
Mr Klein says that such affirmative
measures may not be sustainable and prefers the parcelling out of big projects
into manageable unit which small local investors can take absolute control,
reduce financial and operation costs and reduce costs to consumers. Energy
minister Ochillo Ayacko told investors recently that bulk sale of power
to distributors who would then sell the energy to consumers may be introduced
in the Kenyan market by 2006 but whether this would reduce tariffs is quite
debatable.
Experts say that African
countries fail to attract private capital for developing business and infrastructure
citing policy lags and reversal as a key hindrance. "Market, financial,
regulatory and institutional constraints are issues that African governments
need to address," said Mr Nick Allen, Corporate Finance and Privatisation
Strategy head at PriceWaterhouseCoopers.
Improving physical and regulatory
infrastructure is considered essential in lowering the cost of business
in Africa but the public sector is constrained to finance the upgrade.
Kenya, for instance, needs Ksh100 billion to bring its road network to
an acceptable standard and another Ksh10 billion ($128.2 million) for annual
maintenance. Roads and Public Works minister Raila Odinga lamented last
week that the Ksh8 billion ($102.6 million) raised from the Fuel Levy Fund
was not adequate for maintenance alone.
While Africa looks to foreign
investors to bridge the resource gap, interest from private capital movers
is dwindling despite the region registering the highest returns on investment
in the world. In 2002, Africa received a measly 1.7 per cent ($11 billion)
of the global foreign direct investment inflows. Erratic business laws,
taxation structures and government involvement in business have been blamed
for the poor inflows and high capital flight rates.
Comments\Views
about this article |